Go Back   StriperSurf Forums > Main Forums > Commercial - Recreational - Conservation Issues

Commercial - Recreational - Conservation Issues An open forum for the exchange of ideas and positions on current and proposed regulations in saltwater fishing and conservation.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2012, 06:41 AM
fishinglsister's Avatar
fishinglsister fishinglsister is online now
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Quincy, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,127
Default (More from) Stripers Forever

Stripers Forever members - The following report by SF board member Ken Hastings of Maryland shows how funds raised under the Wallop-Breaux Act through excise taxes on equipment used primarily by hunters and fishermen can be illegally misapplied.

Ken explains that for many years in Maryland, the Wallop-Breaux funds that by law should have been dedicated to enhancing recreational fishing opportunities were instead siphoned off to buy tags for commercial striper/rock fishermen, so they wouldn?t need to pay for the tags themselves.

The current chief of Maryland Fisheries, Thomas O'Connell, in an e-mail to outdoor writer/blogger Gene Mueller, admitted that the Maryland DNR had been using Wallop-Breaux funds for the purchase of commercial striped bass tags since the mid-1990s. O?Connell said that when the illegal practice came to his attention last year, he immediately put an end to it. ?I do not believe this is a justifiable use of sport fishermen's equipment excise tax revenues,? O?Connell added.

The way we see it, the recreational fishery for striped bass in Maryland -- which has more jobs and much greater economic value to the state than the commercial fishery -- is being degraded severely by the commercial fishing effort. At the same time, recreational fishermen have unwittingly paid the commercial fishermen?s regulatory costs!

By eliminating the commercial fishery for striped bass, Maryland and other coastal states with commercial striped bass operations would pick up jobs and economic activity. Striped bass aquaculture would very quickly fill the demand for striped bass at market, and funds gathered from anglers through programs like Wallop-Breaux would be used as the legislation intended ? to enhance recreational fishing opportunities.
Take a minute and read Ken Hasting?s report below. You will be shocked at the revelations.

Over the past 75 years, more than $14 billion raised via excise taxes levied on equipment used primarily in hunting and fishing has been channeled to wildlife and sport fish restoration efforts in the U.S. The funding mechanism, generally labeled the Wallop-Breaux Act (W-B) and amended and re-authorized over the years, has helped to finance and maintain a great variety of~ educational and ecological programs for the non-sporting public as well as for hunters and fishermen.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is responsible for administering W-B and ensuring that each state satisfies the statutory and regulatory mandates associated with W-B funding, including the requirement that the states submit detailed grant requests annually. Each state must also submit year-end fiscal and progress reports. FWS audits each state every five years to ensure compliance.

In 2012, almost $350 million was earmarked for sport fish restoration across the country. Maryland?s share was $3,497,637, or about one percent of the total.

In 1994, right after the coast-wide striped bass moratorium was lifted, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) decided to use a tagging program to ensure that the commercial striper harvest did not exceed the state?s established quota. Each fish harvested commercially would be tagged at the source. Rather than charge the fishermen for the tags, DNR decided to buy them with W-B funds.

DNR had to know that diverting money earmarked for sport fish restoration to subsidize the striped bass commercial fishery violated both the spirit and the letter of the law. DNR also had to know that this misuse of W-B funds would not go down well with the sportsmen who put up the money in the first place, or with the folks at FWS. So DNR simply did not mention the tagging project in its W-B grant applications.

FWS approved the grant applications and sent the requested funds to DNR. Not surprisingly, the year-end fiscal and progress reports from DNR did~not~include any mention of the tags

The tag funding cover-up continued unabated in Maryland for 17 years under different administrations and consumed more than $3 million until exposed in 2011. DNR has never conducted an official investigation of its cover-up. Instead, department spin doctors tried to put the blame on the FWS and insisted it was just doing what other Atlantic coastal state fishery managers do ? dump W-B money into the department?s ?general fund.?

The upshot is that recreational fishermen have been serving as cash cows for a long-running and fraudulent Maryland DNR program. Considering just how easy it was for DNR to hide this illegal action, are W-B funds being similarly diverted to ?general funds? in other coastal states?

As recreational striped bass fishermen and benefactors of the resource, we urge you to put the question to your legislators. They represent you and it is their job to respond to your inquiries?

* For a detailed look at the Wallop-Breaux Act, go to~http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/FASPORT.HTML
Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2012, 03:39 PM
Frank Daignault's Avatar
Frank Daignault Frank Daignault is offline
Writer, Hunter, Surfcaster
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 30,458
Default Re: (More from) Stripers Forever

I'm again disppponted that we have but one more "striper conservation" thread going. These are duplications of two existing threads, so that now we have three! My concern is that many of our members will lose interest in coming here. Inform and entertain through the address of interests in the striper surf is what is our mandate. If others here are happy with these subjects, fine, address them. I can't contribute to these issues on a daily basis without saying the same thing three times. I'm just trying, struggling really, to keep our hits/visitations up in order to better serve our ad customers, our banner sales.

Like you, I am tare-wrasse that Maryland found a way to swindle sport fishing funds into a commercial application. But, frankly, I never trusted them anyway.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 09:56 AM
musselbed musselbed is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: westport MA
Posts: 101
Default Re: (More from) Stripers Forever

One question. The commercial bass participants when purchasing bait, hooks,rods, reels, etc. does that money get taxed the same as the flies and rods from Orvis?
Then why is it that ,all for me a frig you, Stripers forever group crying about tags being used to better manage the commercial fishery? In MA the commercial take is around 10% of the recreational take of fish and it is and always has been a hook and line fishery.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help Save Our Stripers Angler Paul Fishing - New Jersey 0 02-11-2011 12:03 AM
A video is worth a thousand words (sad) Tightline Ask Frank Daignault 28 02-01-2011 07:10 AM
Stripers Forever Gamefish Campaign will Fail? Bob D'Amico Commercial - Recreational - Conservation Issues 42 01-28-2006 10:22 AM
What did I do to make the Stripers hate me? zjennings Fishing - Delaware & Maryland 6 06-02-2004 03:24 PM
How large of a population of stripers can be sustained . . . Doug Ask Frank Daignault 11 11-25-2003 03:40 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2016 StriperSurf.com, All Rights Reserved